Skip to Main Navigation

Uzbekistan - Bukhara and Samarkand Sewerage Project (BSSP) : additional financing - restructuring (Английский)

The Additional Financing (AF) for Bukhara and Samarkand Sewerage Project (BSSP) for Uzbekistan are to mitigate the environmental impact from wastewater pollution and improve the efficiency and sustainability of wastewater management in Bukhara and Samarkand. The AF will be used to scale up activities under the BSSP; cover a financing gap enabling the completion of ongoing investments; and support improvements in wastewater management. This AF will cover the costs of capacity building, physical investments and technical assistance (TA) to the central and local government institutions and utilities to sustain and enhance the impact of the ongoing project; fund preparation of new designs for future operations; and provide support for project implementation. There is no change to the safeguard category of the project. The additional credit will finance interventions in sewerage systems in Bukhara and Samarkand. These interventions will bring additional economic, social, and quality-of-life improvements for the local residents. All activities will be financed by the AF credit. No co-financing from the Government or from multilateral or bilateral agencies is foreseen.

Подробная Информация

  • Дата подготовки документа


  • Тип документа

    Документ о проекте

  • Номер отчета


  • Том


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Страна


  • Регион

    Европа и Центральная Азия,

  • Дата раскрытия информации


  • Disclosure Status


  • Название документа

    Uzbekistan - Bukhara and Samarkand Sewerage Project (BSSP) : additional financing - restructuring

  • Ключевые слова

    public-private partnership;public private partnership;Fragile, Conflict &Violence;Institutional Strengthening and Capacity Building;financial internal rate of return;Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability;Quality and Cost Based Selection;hours of service per day;fund expenditure;Environment and Natural Resources;Economic Rate of Retum;gross domestic product growth;Selection Based on Consultant;drinking water supply network;housing for the poor;alternative sources of water;improvement of water supply;provision of sewerage service;reduction of pollution load;Operational Core Curriculum;sewerage system;water and wastewater;tariff increase;wastewater management;internal control weakness;improved service delivery;operations and maintenance;efficiency of infrastructure;wastewater treatment plant;net present value;exchange rate difference;Public Procurement System;geographic information system;public procurement environment;ownership of asset;per capita income;public awareness effort;public health benefits;quality and efficiency;public awareness campaign;amount of water;composition of output;improving service delivery;piped water supply;local government institution;development of communication;provision of good;terms of trade;foreign economic relation;world market price;procurement capacity assessment;social accountability mechanism;urban sewerage service;reduction in groundwater;water treatment facility;international financial market;public health risk;wastewater treatment capacity;delay in procurement;biological oxygen demand;rates of return;source of financing;capacity for implementation;exchange rate risk;Resettlement Policy Framework;wastewater management system;flow of fund;grievance redress mechanism;human resource management;water service infrastructure;energy efficiency improvement;replacement of equipment;availability of fund;detailed engineering design;costs for consumer;Exchange Rates;sewer system;rural area;wastewater service;Cash flow;positive impact;financial model;financial statement;pumping station;depreciation charge;wastewater pumping;future investment;wastewater pollution;water utility;water utilities;financial analysis;sewer network;wastewater sector;utility management;financial sustainability;Water Services;repayment obligation;public outreach;government support;investment need;depreciation rate;financial loss;investment program;wastewater company;conversion factor;accounting policy;financial projection;cash operating;coverage ratio;procurement delay;contract implementation;wastewater system;total credit;government priority;poor household;wastewater collection;debt service;uzbek sum;base case;managerial capacity;treated effluent;credit finance;agricultural purpose;safeguard issue;procurement process;legislative framework;transparent procurement;bilateral agency;direct contracting;bid security;depreciation policy;eligible contractors;mitigation measure;sensitivity analysis;social concern;financing cost;government decree;financial situation;local engineering;capacity limitation;sewer blockage;poverty datum;wastewater investment;tariff regulation;utility cost;high tariff;environmental benefit;tourism industry;treated wastewater;tourist centers;incremental benefits;incremental cost;project's impact;rural sanitation;preventive maintenance;average cost;internal review;local resident;administrative level;governance issue;adequate maintenance;competitive salary;household expenditure;regulatory authority;internal conflict;municipal governance;price verification;environmental health;water tariff;continuous service;export commodity;rehabilitation contracts;regulatory incentive;import good;operational efficiency;conventional approach;international contractor;demand management;financial prices;bank guarantee;government effort;government source;rural population;utility operation;capacity strengthening;water agencies;currency fluctuation;commodity export;regional water;government investment;institutional context

Файлы Для Скачивания


Официальная версия документа (может содержать подписи, и т.д.)