Skip to Main Navigation

West Africa - Regional Disease Surveillance Capacity Strengthening Project (Английский)

Ratings of Regional Disease Surveillance Capacity Strengthening Project for West Africa were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, risk to development outcome was moderate, Bank performance was moderately satisfactory, and Borrower performance was moderately satisfactory. Some of the lessons learned include: (i) The need to streamline financial work planning process; (ii) It is critical to formally assign key focal points from institutions that will be contracted to serve as project implementing partners; (iii) Appropriate disbursement ceiling in disbursement letters should be established to limit procurement constraints; and (iv) The need to promote country ownership of regional projects through appropriate financing arrangements, and the development and implementation of an effective communication strategy under every project to ensure sustainability post-project closure; (v) Establish CES with the capacity to support multiple countries and ensure appropriate linkage to laboratories; (vi) Streamline long-term FELTP design across ECOWAS member countries; (vii) Advocate for program financing, and retention of FELTP graduates; (viii) Improve the FELTP curriculum and overall program quality; and (viii) Promote gender balance among program participants.

Подробная Информация

  • Дата подготовки документа

    2018/01/15

  • Тип документа

    Отчет о завершении и результатах проекта

  • Номер отчета

    ICR4224

  • Том

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Страна

    Western Africa,

  • Регион

    Африка,

  • Дата раскрытия информации

    2018/02/01

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Название документа

    West Africa - Regional Disease Surveillance Capacity Strengthening Project

  • Ключевые слова

    strategy for accelerated;strengthening human resources;epidemiology and disease surveillance;Human Resources for Health;Technical and Financial Partners;ip disbursements archived;disease prevention and control;economic and financial analysis;capacity for disease surveillance;Human Development and Gender;infectious disease outbreak;quality at entry;Public Health Emergency;global public good;regional public goods;emerging infectious disease;transfer of fund;assessment of outcome;internal audit department;cost benefit analysis;assessment of risk;outputs by components;condition of effectiveness;lack of ownership;disease surveillance capacity;capacity of country;public health system;shipment of good;disease control measure;number of candidates;health information management;resource mobilization strategy;data collection process;disease surveillance system;quality of supervision;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;management of bank;centers of excellence;country of citizenship;trained health worker;financial management staff;response system;simulation exercise;results framework;Health Workers;disbursement rate;counterpart funding;laboratory skill;mitigation measure;intermediate outcome;work planning;project ratings;laboratory technique;procurement delay;epidemiological surveillance;regional capacity;masters level;communication strategy;political issue;cross-border collaboration;electronic information;outbreak response;project financing;direct beneficiaries;project effectiveness;epidemic-prone diseases;short-term training;regional body;regular staff;financing agreement;consulting service;significant challenge;cross border;outcome indicator;counterpart contribution;fiduciary capacity;regional laboratory;government representative;customs agreement;laboratory technician;future outbreaks;consultation process;job retention;legal framework;procurement issue;budget planning;political commitment;core competencies;regional surveillance;management capacity;laboratory diagnosis;financial audits;satisfactory rating;Project Monitoring;scale operation;financial controller;consumption rate;funding gap;external fund;health workforce;development partner;financial specialist;learning opportunity;evaluation activity;eradication efforts;beneficiary survey;stakeholder workshop;epidemiology network;rational use;Health ministries;government use;train activity;budget implication;epidemic response;selection method;single-source procurement;implementing partner;regional investment;immunization programme;funds transfer;future bank;participatory approach;external partner;large-scale investment;primary author;female residents;participating country;project finance;laboratory diagnostics;operational strategy;safeguard policy;Safeguard Policies;prior review;customs procedure;disbursement letter;procurement activities;fm rating;Health Regulation;customs regulation;import good;specialized agency;political climate;laboratory services;software application;emergency response;health technician;early detection;influenza a;final examination;annual budget;insufficient fund;disbursement profile;yellow fever;dengue fever;regional grouping;funding source;data management;sustainable way;appraisal mission;fiduciary assessment;limited capacity;Consulting services;grant funds;management function;

Файлы Для Скачивания

ПОЛНЫЙ ОТЧЕТ

Официальная версия документа (может содержать подписи, и т.д.)