Skip to Main Navigation

Uruguay - Social Program Development Policy Loan Project (Английский)

Ratings for the Social Program Development Policy Loan Project in Uruguay were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, the risk to development outcome was low or negligible, the Bank performance was satisfactory, and the borrower performance was satisfactory. Lessons learned were as follows: (1) In Middle-Income Countries with highly skilled government staff, it is critical to adopt a social participatory and consultative process in the preparation of the operations. Continuous dialogue with official counterparts and independent analysts simplified the team's work during preparation, as the main sectors and policies to be supported were clearly identified; (2) the institutional restrictions of a new administration must be taken into account when preparing an operation. The context in which policy reforms are designed and implemented at the time a new government takes office necessarily generates additional restrictions that must be taken in consideration when designing an operation; and (3) a one-tranche DPL can be an effective instrument for the Bank to provide continuity to reform efforts and lay the foundations for programmatic sector dialogue when a new administration takes office.

Подробная Информация

  • Дата подготовки документа

    2007/02/26

  • Тип документа

    Отчет о завершении и результатах проекта

  • Номер отчета

    ICR353

  • Том

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Страна

    Уругвай,

  • Регион

    Латинская Америка и страны Карибского бассейна,

  • Дата раскрытия информации

    2007/03/14

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Название документа

    Uruguay - Social Program Development Policy Loan Project

  • Ключевые слова

    Program for International Student;social policy;social policies;borrower's ministry;access to health care service;Analytical and Advisory Activities;Social Protection;monitoring and evaluation system;social protection sector;family allowance;economic crisis;Efficiency of Public Expenditures;national health insurance;Macroeconomic and Fiscal Framework;monitoring and evaluation plan;expansion of coverage;public hospital;quality of education;education and health;public health system;catastrophic health insurance;lack of incentive;number of beneficiaries;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;information management systems;technical assistance loan;real exchange rate;availability of data;adjustment of tariff;secondary education system;lack of finance;primary health care;Public Health Promotion;health service provider;seminars and workshops;intermediate outcome;Compulsory Health Finance;general education sector;lack of ownership;public health providers;social insurance program;emergency social program;social security system;number of workers;health care resources;community activity;national resource;private insurance scheme;equity in access;structural adjustment lending;social protection system;Economy and Finance;high oil price;terms of trade;health sector expenditures;school enrollment rate;secondary school dropout;positive fiscal results;financial public sector;formal educational system;equity of opportunity;formal schooling system;international capital market;primary education system;Development Policy Loan;improvement in capital;improvements in management;implementation of reform;social protection program;government's development strategy;infant mortality rate;categories of risk;institutional development impact;lack of transparency;private provider;Macroeconomic Stability;preschool coverage;extreme poverty;medical procedures;Macroeconomic Policy;social indicator;financial result;uninsured patient;uruguayan peso;tranche release;social impact;poor household;billing system;fiscal restriction;living standard;support policy;Labor Market;vulnerable sector;household income;administration procedure;socioeconomic indicator;real wage;statistical information;emergency program;sovereign debt;budget criterion;real gdp;political transition;improving management;catastrophic insurance;incentive structure;basic school;budget allocation;policy option;bilingual education;government strategy;reform process;medical service;gender aspect;macroeconomic context;priority program;managerial ability;administrative capacity;informal worker;infrastructure sector;important change;principal risk;social situation;positive impact;accurate diagnosis;impact indicator;social outcome;public debt;fiscal transfer;macro framework;macroeconomic framework;causal linkage;managing risk;Macroeconomic Management;Loan Operations;core objectives;external partner;institutional change;fiscal deficit;institutional governance;primary balance;agricultural commodity;education board;sustainable policy;social monitoring;quantitative indicators;monitoring tool;enhanced transparency;results framework;government effort;school result;private market;disadvantaged position;poverty incidence;fiscal resource;transparent process;increased transparency;financial market;social recovery;Medical care;enrollment level;monitoring plan;quality education;satisfactory rating;social inclusion;fiscal adjustment;income transfer;investment loan;government priority;political risk;repetition rate;social institution;operations efficiency;state modernization;regulatory management;financial risk;vulnerable population;important policy;fiscal surplus;primary deficit;Tax Reform;monetary management;inflationary impact;participatory monitoring;sector budget;auditing system;formal employment;aggregate budget;education access;fund allocations;budget amount;budget administration;health facility;database maintenance;protection measure;central institution;administrative structure;universal coverage;performance assessment

Файлы Для Скачивания

ПОЛНЫЙ ОТЧЕТ

Официальная версия документа (может содержать подписи, и т.д.)