Skip to Main Navigation

Afghanistan - Emergency National Solidarity Project (Английский)

The Emergency National Solidarity Project for Afghanistan will lay the foundations for strengthening community level governance, and support community-managed sub-projects comprising reconstruction and development that improve the access o f rural communities to social and productive infrastructure and services. The Grant will finance block grants to village communities, consultants for community facilitation and sub- project preparation, consultants for program management and monitoring, capacity building and implementation support for the implementing ministry, and consultants for external evaluation. The project benefits will be (i) the empowerment o f local communities through the establishment o f village level consultative decision making and representative local leadership as a basis for interaction within and between communities on the one hand, and with the administration and aid agencies on the other; and (ii) local level reconstruction, development, and capacity building leading to a decrease in poverty levels. Through these benefits, the project will also contribute to stability in Afghanistan. Likely risks are weak institutional capacity; a fragile security situation; elite capture o f benefits, and misuse o f funds. Appropriate mitigation measures have been proposed to address these risks. The Credit i s expected t o be fully disbursed in a 33 month period.

Подробная Информация

  • Дата подготовки документа

    2003/11/26

  • Тип документа

    Техническое приложение

  • Номер отчета

    T7609

  • Том

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Страна

    Афганистан,

  • Регион

    Южная Азия,

  • Дата раскрытия информации

    2010/07/01

  • Название документа

    Afghanistan - Emergency National Solidarity Project

  • Ключевые слова

    Quality and Cost Based Selection;external monitoring and evaluation;Environmental and Social Impact;monitoring and evaluation arrangement;block grant;block grant allocation;contract good;income generation activities;human capital development;area under irrigation;worst case scenario;operations and maintenance;Donor funded projects;demand for good;payment for goods;education and health;fund under management;learning by doing;project performance indicator;financial management procedure;construction of school;water supply facilities;water user association;revolving loan fund;Internally Displaced Person;community at large;Access to Education;primarily due;average farm size;government service delivery;civil society group;food insecure areas;participatory decision making;basic social service;national development plan;private sector provider;rural area;rural community;community contribution;aid agency;community level;asset transfer;delivery cost;irrigation system;village communities;transitional government;local leadership;inclusive community;security risk;government authority;vulnerable woman;credit scheme;physical work;local development;grant funds;Population Displacement;ethnic group;government administration;government strategy;district officials;severe drought;security situation;food insecurity;audit arrangement;direct payment;financial statement;economic recovery;community procurement;budgetary process;community activity;teaching material;text book;security concern;monitoring process;practical training;consultation mechanism;reconstruction activities;capital expenditure;annual budget;fiscal mechanism;perverse incentives;short-term goal;international advisors;government institution;eligibility criterion;positive return;physical infrastructure;revolving fund;disabled people;primary producer;priority program;reform process;work planning;competitive contract;general fund;procurement arrangement;institutional strengthening;government's commitment;donor community;direct contracting;basic arithmetic;evaluation services;prior review;consulting service;Consulting services;community empowerment;baseline data;field staff;financial procedure;community access;accounting policy;institutional linkage;governance model;staff salary;subsequent phase;public health;audit opinion;monitoring data;human rights;strategy formulation;core functions;program coordination;project execution;Social Sciences;community facilitator;contractual issue;village investment;information dissemination;population size;implementing partner;physical capacity;institutional framework;water distribution;local settlement;water system;management committee;school building;election process;government election;refugee population;participatory planning;community asset;power relation;summer grazing;animal herd;pastoral nomadism;share right;village road;field operations;specific issue;consultation process;equitable access;ensuring transparency;Public Goods;literacy class;construction material;irrigation works;watershed management;community mobilization;rural population;Management Systems;technical standard;productive infrastructure;project costing;bottom-up demand;rural indebtedness;international ngos;class differences;mitigation measure;private good;formal system;social control;legal advocacy;Aid Dependency;high vulnerability;local knowledge;government effectiveness;community management;infrastructure design;small country;diverse environments;natural shock;political authority;food assistance;post conflict;agricultural production;

Файлы Для Скачивания

ПОЛНЫЙ ОТЧЕТ

Официальная версия документа (может содержать подписи, и т.д.)