Skip to Main Navigation

China - Poor Rural Communities Development Project (Английский)

Ratings for the Poor Rural Communities Development Project for China were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory; risk to development outcome was moderate; Bank performance was satisfactory; borrower performance was also satisfactory. Some lessons learned includes: participation. Substantial levels of participation can be achieved on a large scale in government-led projects if sufficient attention is paid to ongoing capacity building and learning. Participation requires a process-oriented approach with a long-term view on learning, and this was achieved in the project through a flexible approach, focusing on a deep understanding of basic participation principles and ongoing learning from practice. Government support for a complex, multi sectoral, and highly innovative operation, strong support from the central government is essential. Unfortunately, the low level of support and guidance from the central government adversely affected the initial pace and quality of implementation of the project. Intensive supervision. Intensive and thorough supervision can play a vital role in the success of a complex, multi sectoral, and highly innovative operation such as this project. Company plus household model. The sustainable mountain agriculture component had mixed experience with the use of the company plus household model as a poverty reduction mechanism. Sequencing of activities. In a multi sectoral project, early completion of infrastructure works is very important to obtaining the full benefit from related investment activities that rely on such infrastructure. Importance of social services. Implementation of the basic education, basic health, and community capacity building components was satisfactory and the components made important contributions to the project's overall favorable impact on villager's wellbeing.

Подробная Информация

  • Дата подготовки документа

    2011/12/20

  • Тип документа

    Отчет о завершении и результатах проекта

  • Номер отчета

    ICR1835

  • Том

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Страна

    Китай,

  • Регион

    Восточная Азия и страны Тихоокеанского региона,

  • Дата раскрытия информации

    2012/02/17

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Название документа

    China - Poor Rural Communities Development Project

  • Ключевые слова

    Provincial Development and Reform Commission;Infant and Maternal Mortality Rates;maternal and child health care;health and other social services;provision of potable water supply;disadvantaged ethnic minority people;poor area administrative village;monitoring and evaluation system;project design and implementation;poor areas development program;economic and financial analysis;poverty reduction project identification;Participation and Civic Engagement;improvement in village access;health and safety risk;remote ethnic minority area;ip disbursements archived;drop out rate;access to primary education;people with disability;basic rural infrastructure;poverty reduction program;community capacity building;ethnic minority groups;poverty reduction activity;external monitoring system;quality at entry;central government support;central government assistance;national poverty reduction;drinking water system;infant mortality rate;poor rural people;food for work;information poor;compulsory education program;public extension service;basic health education;grade completion rate;village access road;participatory poverty assessment;provision of information;poor farm household;household agricultural productivity;local public development;food crop production;accessible by road;irrigation and drainage;basic health knowledge;ethnic minority community;depth of poverty;public health intervention;support for people;outputs by components;rural economic reform;commitment to poverty;quality of supervision;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;impact on poverty;improvement of road;roads and highway;international poverty line;general education sector;rural poverty line;public health measures;reduction in poverty;decline in poverty;functional literacy education;safe drinking water;central government grant;access to asset;level of collaboration;education and health;extremely remote township;drinking water supply;community learning center;participatory project design;primary school teacher;rural infrastructure service;agricultural resource base;drinking water scheme;mountainous area development;investments in agriculture;incidence of poverty;absolute poverty line;gender equity issues;gender focal point;per capita income;natural resource conservation;sustainable poverty reduction;public sector investment;voice and choice;disadvantaged social groups;participatory approach;Basic Education;counterpart funding;poor village;participatory planning;causal link;Rural Poor;absolute poor;public good;land improvement;mitigation measure;basic infrastructure;area population;agricultural production;Public Goods;land improvements;Health Service;mountain agriculture;central management;improved livelihood;community participation;natural village;cash crop;Support for Agriculture;assessment system;civil works;extreme poverty;village road;Animal Husbandry;rural area;institution building;water problem;productive activity;reduction measure;increased income;village clinic;risk assessment;arable land;grain crop;medical assistance;enrollment rate;technology training;primary beneficiaries;project costing;livelihood security;road access;sectoral approach;vulnerable group;poverty focus;household income;referral system;soil erosion;living condition;project datum;special training;government staff;grant funds;cumulative investments;participation process;grant basis;gender inequalities;Gender Inequality;grant funding;increased investment;remedial action;insufficient funding;government funding;management structure;health component;excessive levels;institutional demand;excessive investment;drug list;greater access;sectoral priority;toll highway;Livestock Production;sectoral strategy;basic equipment;Essential Drugs;clinical protocol;results framework;health status;living skill;basic skill;participatory monitoring;household level;rising cost;field crop;Investment priorities;medical cost;employment opportunities;employment opportunity;nutritional status;poor household;community cohesion

Файлы Для Скачивания

ПОЛНЫЙ ОТЧЕТ

Официальная версия документа (может содержать подписи, и т.д.)