Skip to Main Navigation

Transport sector note to the draft CEM (Английский)

The transport system of a country has long been acknowledged to be a necessary component in facilitating economic development and poverty alleviation-it is critical for a small country like Montenegro. For a middle-income European country and a small state, Montenegro transportation network should facilitate internal connectivity; promote economic diversification with tourism activities spread throughout the country. In the winter, frequent and long delays in traffic of the key highway linking the center and north can effectively cut off access to the north for hours, sometimes days, and during extreme winter conditions even weeks. This note, which has a limited focus, has been prepared to: 1) highlight the importance of transport and its deficiencies for Montenegro's development, 2) review and assess at a preliminary level the government's transport strategy, and 3) highlight major policy issues and bottlenecks for attention of policymakers. Government has clear intent to improve one stop border operations but further reform of the customs administration may be needed. A study to fill this gap may reveal clear areas for improvements as well as opportunities for increased involvement of local firms in the carriage of goods through and from Montenegro.

Подробная Информация

  • Дата подготовки документа


  • Тип документа

    Рабочие документы

  • Номер отчета


  • Том


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Страна


  • Регион

    Европа и Центральная Азия,

  • Дата раскрытия информации


  • Disclosure Status


  • Название документа

    Transport sector note to the draft CEM

  • Ключевые слова

    road infrastructure;road safety;railway transport;rural area;national road safety strategy;third party insurance premium;financing need;investment in railway infrastructure;protection of cultural heritage;number of traffic accidents;number of victims;maintenance of transport infrastructure;road transport;road safety management;national development plan;number of vehicles;road safety action;speed limit;road sector;rail infrastructure;number of passengers;user pay principle;road safety improvement;cross country comparison;cost of traffic;road condition;access to health;measure of trade;efforts of governments;main road network;term capital;road network density;area traffic control;road user charge;rail infrastructure manager;Road Traffic Crashes;poor road;road user behavior;poor road condition;modern transport system;institutional management capacity;budget line item;learning by doing;carriage of good;improving road safety;delivery of service;Local Economic Development;funds for road;road safety responsibility;rural development policy;rural development strategy;small scale enterprise;road and bridges;public-private partnership;public private partnership;tracking and tracing;development of tourism;traffic accident victims;length of road;Urban Transport Planning;road safety audit;participation of citizens;road safety situation;public administration system;social cohesion objective;road safety fund;rail sector;service delivery mechanism;transport network;guard rail;passenger traffic;safety zone;vehicle fleet;government action;external connectivity;funding source;internal transport;passenger train;freight traffic;rail network;institutional framework;inadequate infrastructure;poverty alleviation;public debt;road density;maritime sector;rural transportation infrastructure;strategy implementation;pedestrian crossing;tunnel wall;warning signs;steep gradient;rolling stock;rural community;road marking;injured person;road planning;local action;food producer;international agreement;maritime service;maritime affair;structural adjustment;traffic fine;budget transfer;increased competition;inadequate maintenance;road quality;commercial operation;jurisdictional responsibilities;effective application;operational efficiency;privatization agenda;road investment;ceteris paribus;social facility;creating opportunity;income generation;increasing growth;fatality rate;local public;safety activity;border operation;payment system;cargo consolidation;transit country;transaction cost;procedural requirement;cycle lane;local economy;traffic network;motor bike;promoting growth;air transport;ecological tourism;environmental area;examination fee;vehicle insurance;strategic action;government involvement;autonomous board;social accountability;executive agency;road corridor;international expert;green development;rail link;truck industry;administrative capital;tourism activity;budget support;tourism activities;commercial development;infrastructure maintenance;railway sector;infrastructure connectivity;Regulatory Bodies;national strategy;summer season;average speed;coastal tourism;regulatory body;equity reasons;traffic growth;staff rationalization;regional railway;financial crisis;good traffic;mountainous terrain;Social Protection;marine transport;air traffic;investment budget;state funding;aviation sector;external trade;small country;geographical location;transport cost;city traffic;transportation network;railway traffic;economic diversification;fuel tax;port authority;landlord port;significant factor;steep slope;tunnel entrance;long tunnel;port administration;regulatory function;operational management;terminal operation;road tax;high road;primary road;secondary road;State Treasury;mountainous area;freight vehicle;container terminal;Wage Bill;freight operation;coastal road;urban development;rail transport;transport time;rail entities;agricultural production;rural resident;health facility;steel mill;marine service;increased speed;regulatory arrangement

Файлы Для Скачивания


Официальная версия документа (может содержать подписи, и т.д.)