rural water supply and sanitation program;rural water supply program;united nations children's fund;information storage and retrieval system;water supply and sanitation ...  Подробнее + sector;rural water supply system;operation and maintenance cost;village water committee;national water supply;central water supply;maintenance of water supply;investment in water supply;rural water supply sector;community management;community water supply;water system;research design;improved water supply;choice of technology;environmental health;rural water systems;sustainability of community;central government agency;village water system;country case study;large commercial enterprise;poor rural household;effect on health;regional water resource;differences in treatment;hygiene education interventions;formation of association;social investment fund;repair and maintenance;sphere of influence;local government agency;audit of account;improved water source;maintenance and repair;private sector involvement;marginal social benefit;marginal social cost;private water connection;prior written permission;operations and maintenance;millennium development goal;poor rural community;model of sustainability;provision of post;village water supply;lack of availability;data collection activity;gender and poverty;water system operator;sense of ownership;degree of autonomy;body of knowledge;rural water service;rural water sector;chlorination of water;focus group;private company;regression analysis;community participation;tariff collection;cash balance;construction support;social capital;data gathering;village characteristic;collected information;rural system;church organizations;secondary data;financial aspect;non-governmental organization;capital replacement;preventive maintenance;external factor;consumer satisfaction;governance arrangement;management capacity;financial status;annual rainfall;Water Services;tariff design;poverty trap;baseline conditions;sampling frame;institutional model;support system;pipe system;external support;project failure;tariff structure;political scientist;anecdotal evidence;field visits;municipal government;procurement system;external assistance;random sample;political interference;agency staff;project construction;construction quality;Conflict Resolution;technical expertise;rural area;recovery effort;source water;baseline data;political clout;private connections;public tap;ample evidence;average household;individual artisans;field conditions;social factor;lowland forest;selection criterion;average age;population expansion;financial factor;municipal authority;Social Conflict;environmental factor;institutional factor;system breakdown;poor household;vicious cycle;poor health;community ownership;multilateral donor;resource cost;physical infrastructure;factor analysis;sustainability indicator;model result;economic efficiency;moral hazard;piped water;capital contribution;survey respondent;primary beneficiaries;regression results;summary statistic;standard deviation;system operation;present study;hygiene promotion;community level;information collection;regular monitoring;remedial action;institutional framework;multivariate model;Sanitation Services;decentralization process;water quality;raising capital;political tool;future research;financial sustainability;aid organization;household tap;secure bank;financial constraint;water use;health benefit;field site;Technical Training;administrative function;capital financing;adequate capacity;community woman;social cohesion;behavioral change;legal framework;community structure;sustainable future;subsidiary right;local reality;engineering design;multivariate analysis;sample household;gender difference;individual variable;sample selection;program objectives;investment program;moral obligation;financing system;capital subsidy;financial cost;repair service;Cash flow;private individuals;municipal operation;national environmental;donor funding;water ministries;minimum subsidy;rural population;  Менее подробно –